0.89× the performance on Graphics Rendering testsĪIBB_MISTer.jpg (211.41 KiB) Viewed 9526 times.2.61× the performance on Graphics Rendering tests.2.78× the performance on Graphics Rendering tests.5.51× the performance on Integer Math tests.The results are less good than the ones of regarding the graphic rendering. Of course with AGA selected and D-cache on. Test done with the Mister and the above attached core. 0.54× the performance on Floating Point Math tests - note that the MiST does not have a dedicated FPU, unlike the Amiga 4000ĪIBB_MIST.jpg (243.53 KiB) Viewed 9543 times.0.26× the performance on Graphics Rendering tests.1.26× the performance on Integer Math tests.1.78× the performance on Floating Point Math tests - note that MiST does not have an FPU, unlike the Amiga 3000Ĭompared to an 25MHz 68040 Amiga 4000, AIBB reports the MiST core as having:.0.75× the performance on Graphics Rendering tests.1.93× the performance on Integer Math tests.8.08× the performance on Floating Point Math testsĬompared to a 25MHz 68030 Amiga 3000, AIBB reports the MiST core as having:.0.80× the performance on Graphics Rendering tests.4.86× the performance on Integer Math tests.Will now do the test on the Mister with the last core revision that Hodor attached.Ĭompared to a 14MHz 68020 Amiga 1200, AIBB reports the MiST core as having: Not bad at all but quite below the Mister. I've just finished the test with AIBB on the Mist and here are the results. (Tests performed on MiSTer v201014, Minimig v200071, with 020 CPU selected, D-Cache on, AGA, etc - the usual modern Amiga settings.) Any instruction set optimizations did not arrive until the 68040) So 020 vs 030 as far as MiSTer goes is kind of moot. (Also note that the 68030 was almost identical to the 68020 overall, just with an additional 256 byte data cache, a process shrink, and an added burst mode for the caches. Hopefully this should put to rest that just because the cores says that it’s an 68020, it’s definitely in a very different league when it comes to performance than the 68020 computers that were shipped, and almost on the performance level of the 68040-based Amiga 4000. 0.62× the performance on Floating Point Math tests - note that the MiSTer does not have a dedicated FPU, unlike the Amiga 4000.1.08× the performance on Graphics Rendering tests.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |